Prosecutor discretion

by Richard Jones  - April 5, 2022

Introduction to Prosecutor Discretion

Prosecutor discretion is a critical aspect of the criminal justice system, as it allows prosecutors to make decisions based on the unique circumstances of each case. This article will delve into the concept of prosecutor discretion, exploring its definition, factors that affect it, and real-world examples in plea bargaining. By understanding the power held by prosecutors in the decision-making process, we can more effectively appreciate the nuances of the criminal justice system.

In order to fully grasp the concept of prosecutor discretion, it’s important to consider its definitions, factors, and examples in plea bargaining. In the following sections, we will examine each of these aspects in detail, revealing the intricacies and significance of this powerful tool within the criminal justice system.

Prosecutor Discretion: Definition of Prosecutor Discretion

Prosecutorial discretion refers to the legal authority given to prosecutors to make decisions about how best to handle individual cases, including charging decisions, plea agreements, and other aspects of criminal justice administration. This discretionary power allows prosecutors to consider the unique facts and circumstances of each case on a case-by-case basis, providing a level of flexibility within the criminal justice system.

Prosecutorial discretion is a vital component of criminal justice, as it enables prosecutors to adapt their strategies to the circumstances of individual cases. Due to the legal authority given to them, prosecutors have the ability to make charging decisions and shape the course of a case. This helps ensure that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner.

Despite the discretionary power granted to prosecutors in making these case-by-case decisions, it’s essential to note that this authority is not absolute. There are standards and guidelines within the criminal justice system that must be upheld, ensuring that prosecutorial discretion is exercised fairly and ethically.

Prosecutor Discretion: Factors That Influence Prosecutor Discretion

There are several factors that can influence a prosecutor’s discretionary decisions, including the strength of evidence in a case, the input of victims, the criminal history of the accused, the public interest, the limited resources available, and policy priorities. Understanding these factors can shed light on the complex decision-making process involved in prosecutorial discretion.

Evidence strength is a significant element for prosecutors to consider, as the quality and quantity of evidence can directly impact the likelihood of securing a conviction. The stronger the evidence, the more likely a prosecutor is to pursue a case. Victim input is also an essential factor, as prosecutors must weigh the desires and needs of victims when making their decisions. Additionally, the criminal history of the accused can play a significant role, as prosecutors may be more likely to pursue cases involving repeat offenders or particularly heinous crimes.

Public interest is another element that can guide prosecutorial discretion, as it’s crucial for the criminal justice system to maintain the trust and confidence of society. Prosecutors must consider the feelings and needs of the community when making their decisions. Limited resources can also affect prosecutorial discretion; with finite funding and time, prosecutors must prioritize cases that are most likely to result in convictions, or that carry greater public safety concerns. Lastly, policy priorities can dictate prosecutorial discretion, as the goals and values of a jurisdiction’s government can shape the types of cases pursued.

Prosecutor Discretion: Examples of Prosecutor Discretion in Plea Bargaining

One of the most significant areas in which prosecutorial discretion is exercised is in the realm of plea bargaining. Plea bargaining involves a negotiated settlement between the prosecutor and the accused, with the objective of reaching an agreement that benefits both parties. This process can involve charge reduction, sentencing recommendations, pre-trial diversion programs, or conditional dismissal, among other techniques.

A plea agreement is a primary tool used in plea bargaining, as it allows the accused to plead guilty to lesser charges in exchange for a reduced sentence or the dropping of more severe charges. This can help expedite the resolution of a case and save valuable resources in the criminal justice system. Additionally, negotiated settlements can be mutually beneficial for both the prosecution and the accused, as it helps mitigate risk for both parties.

Prosecutorial discretion can also be exercised when considering charge reductions, as prosecutors are given the authority to amend or reduce charges in exchange for a guilty plea. Sentencing recommendations, another facet of prosecutorial discretion, involve a prosecutor advocating for a particular sentence in exchange for a plea agreement. Pre-trial diversion programs and conditional dismissal are further examples of discretion in plea bargaining, as they allow for alternative resolutions to criminal cases that may better suit the interests of all parties involved.

In conclusion, prosecutor discretion is a vital aspect of the criminal justice system, allowing for greater flexibility and adaptability in addressing the unique challenges and factors in each case. By understanding the factors that influence prosecutorial discretion and the ways in which it is exercised, we can better appreciate the role that prosecutors play in upholding justice and fairness within our society.


Prosecutorial discretion is a critical and often debated aspect of the criminal justice system. It refers to the authority that prosecutors have to choose when to charge someone with a crime, what charges to file, and how to pursue a case in court. Proponents of prosecutor discretion argue that it allows for efficient use of limited resources, individualized justice, and flexibility in the legal process. Critics, on the other hand, contend that it can lead to arbitrary charging decisions, abuse of power, and discrimination. In this article, we will explore prosecutor discretion through various lenses, including ethical considerations, criticisms, and benefits.

Ethical considerations in prosecutor discretion

Given the significant power that prosecutors hold in the criminal justice system, it is essential that they adhere to certain ethical standards and guidelines for prosecutorial decision-making. One such set of guidelines is the code of conduct, which outlines the responsibilities and duties of a prosecutor in pursuing justice fairly and impartially. Some of the primary ethical considerations in prosecutorial discretion include:

Conflict of interest: Prosecutors must avoid situations in which their personal or financial interests could compromise their impartiality or integrity. If a conflict of interest arises, they are obligated to disclose it and potentially to recuse themselves from the case.

Bias: To ensure justice and fairness in prosecutor decision-making, it is crucial for prosecutors to recognize and address any implicit or explicit biases that they may harbor. Bias can negatively affect the charging and negotiation process, resulting in disparities in treatment for different individuals or groups.

Justice: Ethical prosecutorial decision-making requires striking a balance between holding offenders accountable, protecting the rights of the accused, and serving the public interest. Prosecutors should consider the unique circumstances of each case and act in a manner that promotes justice for all parties involved.

Criticisms of prosecutor discretion

Despite the ethical guidelines and considerations that govern prosecutorial discretion, there are a number of criticisms that have been raised against it. Among the most notable are:

Judicial oversight: One concern is the lack of sufficient judicial oversight in prosecutorial decision-making. As a result, prosecutors may make charging decisions that are inconsistent, arbitrary, or discriminatory, without facing any consequences or scrutiny for their actions.

Arbitrary charging decisions: Related to the issue of judicial oversight is the potential for arbitrary charging decisions. Some argue that the broad discretion afforded to prosecutors allows them to pursue cases based on personal preferences, political motivations, or other factors unrelated to the merits of the case.

Accountability: Another criticism of prosecutorial discretion is that it can shield prosecutors from accountability. In cases where prosecutors make questionable decisions or abuse their power, it can be difficult for affected individuals or the public to challenge those actions and seek redress.

Discrimination: Finally, some critics argue that prosecutorial discretion can result in discriminatory actions. For example, prosecutors may be more likely to charge or pursue harsher sentences for certain ethnic or social groups, contributing to disparities in the criminal justice system.

Benefits of prosecutor discretion

Despite the criticisms and potential pitfalls associated with prosecutorial discretion, there are also several notable benefits that it provides within the criminal justice system. These include:

Efficiency: Discretion allows prosecutors to manage limited resources effectively and focus on cases that are most important to public safety and the administration of justice. By choosing not to pursue every low-level offense, prosecutors can dedicate their time and resources to more serious cases.

Individualized justice: Prosecutor discretion enables a more individualized approach to justice, taking into account the specific circumstances and facts of each case. This allows prosecutors to tailor charges and plea agreements to promote fairness and proportionality in sentencing.

Resource allocation: By prioritizing cases and making strategic charging decisions, prosecutors can help allocate resources more efficiently within the criminal justice system. This ensures that time, money, and personnel are utilized in the most effective manner possible.

Public interest: Prosecutorial discretion allows prosecutors to consider the public interest when making case decisions. This includes weighing factors such as public safety, victim impact, and the potential for rehabilitation of those accused of crimes.

Flexibility: Finally, discretion provides the flexibility needed for prosecutors to adapt their approach in light of new information or changing circumstances. This can include adjusting charges or plea agreements when additional facts come to light or considering mitigating factors that impact a defendant’s culpability.


Prosecutor discretion is a complex and often contentious topic within the criminal justice system. While concerns regarding ethical considerations, arbitrary charging decisions, and potential abuse of power are certainly valid, the benefits of prosecutorial discretion should not be ignored. Ultimately, the challenge lies in striking the appropriate balance between allowing prosecutors the flexibility needed to effectively pursue justice and ensuring that appropriate checks and oversight are in place to prevent potential abuses and discrimination.

Prosecutor discretion is an essential aspect of the criminal justice system, as it grants prosecutors the autonomy to make decisions based on the unique circumstances of each case. This power allows prosecutors to effectively manage their caseloads and prioritize resources for the most severe crimes. In this article, we will explore the role of prosecutor discretion in the criminal justice system, how it affects defendant’s rights, the impact it has on the outcome of cases, and the limits placed on this discretion in the context of plea bargaining.

The role of the prosecutor in the criminal justice system

The criminal justice system is complex and varied, with many different players working together to enforce the law and maintain public safety. One of the most crucial figures in this system is the prosecutor, who has the responsibility of representing the state in legal proceedings against defendants accused of committing crimes. The prosecutor’s responsibilities are vast and far-reaching, with the power to influence the outcome of criminal cases, the fairness of legal proceedings, and the very sense of duty to society.

Some of the key aspects of a prosecutor’s job include determining what charges to file against a defendant, gathering and presenting evidence, and pursuing a fair prosecution on behalf of the community. In carrying out these duties, prosecutors must exercise discretion in deciding which charges to bring and the best strategies for proving their cases. This ability to adapt and make decisions on a case-by-case basis is not only essential for the effective functioning of the criminal justice system but also helps ensure that the law is applied fairly and consistently to all defendants.

However, with this power to influence the fate of criminal cases comes the responsibility to act with integrity and focus on the pursuit of justice. Prosecutors must uphold their duty to society by refraining from pursuing cases without merit or engaging in unethical behavior. Ultimately, the effective use of prosecutor discretion depends on maintaining a delicate balance between the pursuit of justice and the need for fair prosecution.

How prosecutor discretion affects the defendant’s rights

Defendant’s rights are a fundamental aspect of the criminal justice system, ensuring that every person charged with a crime is given a fair trial and the opportunity to defend themselves. Prosecutor discretion plays a significant role in shaping the course of a defendant’s experience within the system, influencing factors such as the charges brought against them, the presentation of evidence, and the overall fairness of the process.

The due process rights of defendants are directly impacted by the choices prosecutors make in determining charges and presenting evidence. For example, prosecutors may decide to bring more severe charges against a defendant if they believe it will result in a higher likelihood of conviction, potentially limiting the defendant’s ability to negotiate a favorable outcome. Similarly, decisions regarding evidence presentation can affect a defendant’s ability to mount a robust defense and receive a fair trial.

Prosecutors must exercise their discretion impartially and without bias to ensure that defendants are treated fairly and in accordance with the law. By being mindful of the impact their decisions can have on the defendant’s rights, prosecutors can help uphold the principles of justice within the criminal justice system.

The impact of prosecutor discretion on the outcome of cases

Prosecutor discretion can have a substantial effect on the outcome of criminal cases, with decisions at various stages of the legal process influencing factors such as sentencing recommendations, charge bargaining, and trial strategy. The choices made by prosecutors can directly determine the defendant’s fate, potentially leading to dismissals, reduced sentences, or even changes to the charges brought against them.

For example, prosecutors may opt to offer a more lenient sentencing recommendation in exchange for a guilty plea, saving valuable resources and guaranteeing a conviction. They may also engage in charge bargaining, allowing a defendant to plead guilty to a lesser charge to avoid lengthy trials or the risk of facing more severe charges. Decisions during trial strategy, such as which witnesses to call and what evidence to present, can also impact the case’s outcome.

Given the power prosecutors hold in shaping the outcome of cases, it is vital that they are held to high standards of ethical conduct and maintain a commitment to the pursuit of justice. By acting within the bounds of prosecutorial ethics, they can ensure that their discretion is used fairly and effectively in the best interest of society and the individuals involved in each case.

Limits on prosecutor discretion in plea bargaining

Plea bargaining is a critical aspect of the criminal justice system, allowing for the efficient resolution of cases and the potential for more favorable outcomes for defendants. However, the broad discretion afforded to prosecutors in this process has raised concerns about potential abuses of power and a lack of accountability. As a result, several limits on prosecutor discretion in plea bargaining have been established.

Legal guidelines, such as mandated sentencing guidelines or mandatory minimum sentences, are examples of restrictions placed on the discretion of prosecutors when negotiating plea deals. These rules can limit the ability of prosecutors to offer significant concessions or decide on sentences arbitrarily.

Judicial review is another mechanism to limit prosecutor discretion in plea bargaining, allowing judges to scrutinize the terms of a negotiated agreement and reject deals they deem inappropriate or unjust. This oversight helps promote transparency and fairness in the bargaining process while providing an additional level of accountability for prosecutorial decision-making.

Finally, ethical constraints and accountability mechanisms are critical in ensuring that prosecutors exercise their discretion fairly and justly. Prosecutors are held to professional codes of conduct that outline the ethical obligations they must adhere to when engaging in their duties – including the negotiation of plea deals. By following these ethical principles and adhering to the limits on their discretion, prosecutors can help ensure the fair and equitable administration of justice through the plea bargaining process.

Frequently Asked Questions about Prosecutor Discretion

Why is prosecutor discretion important?

Prosecutor discretion is important because it allows prosecutors to make informed decisions on whether to pursue a case or not. They take into account the available evidence, the severity of the offense, the defendant’s criminal history and background, and public interests before deciding to prosecute a case. This discretion ensures that limited resources in the criminal justice system are used wisely and helps in focusing on the most violent and complex cases. Additionally, it prevents the unnecessary prosecution of minor offenses that might result in an imbalance of justice towards defendants.

What are the limits to prosecutor discretion?

There are certain legal, ethical, and practical limitations that exist to keep prosecutor discretion in check. For instance, prosecutors must follow the law and are subject to ethical rules, such as the requirement not to pursue charges they know are not supported by the evidence. They must also avoid discriminatory or biased practices when exercising their discretion. Furthermore, they are accountable to the public; often, elected officials or supervisory attorneys oversee their decision-making process, providing external checks on their actions. Additionally, the court system can act as a safeguard against potential abuses of discretion by reviewing and potentially dismissing cases.

Can a victim force a prosecutor to pursue a case?

A victim does not have the legal authority to force a prosecutor to pursue a criminal case. However, they do have the right to report a crime and provide evidence related to the incident. Ultimately, the decision to prosecute lies within the discretion of the prosecutor, who considers various factors before moving forward with a case. In some jurisdictions, victims may have the opportunity to express their opinions on the prosecution or plea bargaining, but ultimately, the prosecutor’s decision will prevail.

What role does public opinion play in prosecutor discretion?

Public opinion can significantly influence prosecutor discretion, particularly because many prosecutors are elected officials who serve the public. Public perception, community values, and local crime concerns can impact a prosecutor’s decision to pursue a case, issue charges, or negotiate plea agreements. However, it’s important to note that prosecutors must exercise their discretion in accordance with the law and avoid taking actions solely based on public pressures or their interests. They must take a balanced approach, considering both the public interest and the need for fair and impartial justice for defendants.

Notable cases

Richard Jones

Austin criminal defense attorney Richard Jones. This legal practice is dedicated to helping individuals like you—those caught in the crosshairs of criminal allegations and in dire need of dependable legal counsel. Richard also proficient in handling allegations related to theft crimes and is prepared to assist you during this stressful time.